Men held in solitary confinement at the Menard Correctional Center have declared a liquids strike, in addition to a nearly four-week-old hunger strike, escalating their resistance against open-ended isolation with the few means of protest they have left.
“It is an increasingly dire situation,” said Staughton Lynd, who has been supporting the incarcerated men along with his wife Alice, both of whom are lawyers and long-time political activists. “Alice and I are really beside ourselves worrying whether someone has to die in order to make something happen in southern Illinois.”
Tom Shaer, Illinois Department of Corrections Director of Communications, confirmed to Common Dreams that a no-liquid strike was declared on Friday by what he believes to be five men. The Lynds say the number of liquid and food strikers could be higher, and the numbers of those who are fasting but have not declared a strike even greater.
The strikers are being held under administrative detention in a high security area of the prison, where they have been placed in solitary confinement with no explanation or due process, said Brian Nelson, prisoner rights coordinator for the Uptown People’s Law Center.
The men are putting their lives on the line for “moderate” demands, says Staughton Lynd. “They have said that if the administration will sit down with them one by one and explain to each person why he is in administrative detention, how long he can expect to be there, what he needs to do to get out, and how his privileges will increase as he nears end of time in administrative detention. Those don’t seem like very forbidding demands.”
“Our complaints are all pursuant to our constitutional rights & human dignity,” wrote an anonymous incarcerated man upon announcing the hunger strike. “Such as ‘implement uniform written policies that provide for constitutionally adequate ‘notice’ of why an inmate is being placed in Administrative Detention at the HSU, & reasonable, periodic review in the form of annual informal hearings that allow me to refute the alleged reasons why my placement in AD is being continued.’… No one here has been given ‘notice’ to why we’re here.”
“You’re putting your life on the line after three days. They are sacrificing self and health to make a statement, to say something is very wrong,” said Nelson, who was formerly incarcerated at the now shuttered super-max Tamms prison in Illinois. “In that situation there aren’t many ways you can speak out against injustices. They have to go to the extreme and do a hunger strike.”
Shaer denied that prisoners are being kept in the dark about the reasons for their conditions of confinement. Yet, Alice Lynd told Common Dreams she has personally seen numerous formal grievances that verify the men’s claims.
“The U.S. Supreme Court requires that before inmates are placed in high maximum security, they be provided notice, hearing, written reasons, a statement of what they can do to move to a lower security level, and the right to appeal,” she said. “Whether the prison calls it high security with capital or lower case letters, the men want the due process that is their right.”
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT